Ellie Schafer (White House Visitors Office Director)
"LAST NAME: The family's last name.
FIRST NAME: 'Baby' as a first name
MIDDLE NAME: NMN as in No Middle Name
DOB: Use the date you are submitting the request to us as their birthday
GENDER: if the parents know put that gender down if not, you can enter either M or F as we'll ask you to update it at the time of birth
SOCIAL: As they have will not have a SSN and are under 18, you will not need to enter this field. Again if the spreadsheet asked for a social enter 9 zero's (not the word nine zeros but 000000000 and yes it happens!)
CITIZEN/CITY/STATE: The citizen, city and state should be entered the same as the parent"
- Email to Capitol Hill staffers explaining how to register an unborn child visiting the White House.
Kinda creepy, aye? You'd think it would be enough for the mother to register herself and note she's 'with child'...I guess not.
So many things came to mind when I saw this email.
1. Why are they bothering to keep track of unborn children hanging out at the White House with mom? I can't think of any logical reason other than simply padding their statistics...Some day we'll read in the history books: 'President Barack Obama had more unborn children visit him than any other president in history'.
2. Why are they considering an unborn child a person? Knowing the Obama administration's stance on dissecting the unborn in the womb I'm surprised they consider an unborn child anything other than possible waste material - or a future voter.
3. Why are they referring to these children as "M or F"? That is so unenlightened in Liberal thought. It should be 'M or F or FM or MF'...Or even better 'MFers'.
4. Why is identification needed at all; not just for the baby, but for the parents? Why is it necessary to identify yourself when visiting the White House, but not when voting for the person who inhabits the White House? I know, it's a radical question.
I ask again, kinda creepy, aye? Not just this policy, but the entire cast of ghouls creating and executing the policy.
FIRST NAME: 'Baby' as a first name
MIDDLE NAME: NMN as in No Middle Name
DOB: Use the date you are submitting the request to us as their birthday
GENDER: if the parents know put that gender down if not, you can enter either M or F as we'll ask you to update it at the time of birth
SOCIAL: As they have will not have a SSN and are under 18, you will not need to enter this field. Again if the spreadsheet asked for a social enter 9 zero's (not the word nine zeros but 000000000 and yes it happens!)
CITIZEN/CITY/STATE: The citizen, city and state should be entered the same as the parent"
- Email to Capitol Hill staffers explaining how to register an unborn child visiting the White House.
Kinda creepy, aye? You'd think it would be enough for the mother to register herself and note she's 'with child'...I guess not.
So many things came to mind when I saw this email.
1. Why are they bothering to keep track of unborn children hanging out at the White House with mom? I can't think of any logical reason other than simply padding their statistics...Some day we'll read in the history books: 'President Barack Obama had more unborn children visit him than any other president in history'.
2. Why are they considering an unborn child a person? Knowing the Obama administration's stance on dissecting the unborn in the womb I'm surprised they consider an unborn child anything other than possible waste material - or a future voter.
3. Why are they referring to these children as "M or F"? That is so unenlightened in Liberal thought. It should be 'M or F or FM or MF'...Or even better 'MFers'.
4. Why is identification needed at all; not just for the baby, but for the parents? Why is it necessary to identify yourself when visiting the White House, but not when voting for the person who inhabits the White House? I know, it's a radical question.
I ask again, kinda creepy, aye? Not just this policy, but the entire cast of ghouls creating and executing the policy.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home