Rep. Jim Moran (D - Virginia)
“It [the Republican successes in the 2010 elections] happened for the same reason the Civil War happened in the United States. It happened because the Southern states, the slaveholding states, didn’t want to see a president who was opposed to slavery. In this case, I believe, a lot of people in the United States don’t want to be governed by an African-American, particularly one who is liberal, who wants to spend money and who wants to reach out to include everyone in our society.”
How does this "Southern" theory explain the massive gains Republicans made in Pennsylvania, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin, Iowa, Minnesota, New Hampshire, Maine, Connecticut, North Dakota? Maybe Canada considers these "southern", but they are hardly "southern" in the United States. Feel free to check on these gains if you don't believe me: Before the election , After the election
Moran is a complete moron, and if he was even a little honest he'd admit the "Southern states" were hardly the reason for the huge Republican gains in the 2010 Election. Also, if he was a little more honest he'd admit race was hardly the reason for the huge Republicans gains in the 2010 Election...But he did hit on the one variable which did account for the huge Republican gains in the 2010 Election: LIBERALISM!
From 2008-2010 the country witnessed what Liberals without restraint were truly about...AND WE DIDN'T LIKE WHAT WE SAW!
This was the reason for Republican success in the 2010 Election, and it had much less to do with liking Republicans than it had to do with disliking Liberals.
How does this "Southern" theory explain the massive gains Republicans made in Pennsylvania, Illinois, Michigan, Wisconsin, Iowa, Minnesota, New Hampshire, Maine, Connecticut, North Dakota? Maybe Canada considers these "southern", but they are hardly "southern" in the United States. Feel free to check on these gains if you don't believe me: Before the election , After the election
Moran is a complete moron, and if he was even a little honest he'd admit the "Southern states" were hardly the reason for the huge Republican gains in the 2010 Election. Also, if he was a little more honest he'd admit race was hardly the reason for the huge Republicans gains in the 2010 Election...But he did hit on the one variable which did account for the huge Republican gains in the 2010 Election: LIBERALISM!
From 2008-2010 the country witnessed what Liberals without restraint were truly about...AND WE DIDN'T LIKE WHAT WE SAW!
This was the reason for Republican success in the 2010 Election, and it had much less to do with liking Republicans than it had to do with disliking Liberals.
posted by Poison Pero @ Sunday, January 30, 2011
1 Comments:
At 7:18 PM,
brian said…
this is typical of a liberal. they have always been sore losers, and will spin,spin,spin whatever makes them feel beter to rationalize the obvious. it's too hard for them to just say "ok, we are wrong and the american people have spoken." just like daddy obama. when the american people voiced their dislike of obamacare, he refused to concede this. he said that he just couldn't understand why his message just couldn't get through to the american people. so, the apple still doesn't fall far from the tree!
Post a Comment
<< Home