The New York Times (All the BS That's Fit to Print)

"If he is confirmed, we think there is a chance Mr. Roberts could be a superb chief justice. But it is a risk. We might be reluctant to roll the dice even for a nomination for associate justice, but for a nomination for a chief justice—particularly one who could serve 30 or more years—the stakes are simply too high. Senators should vote against Mr. Roberts not because they know he does not have the qualities to be an excellent chief justice, but because he has not met the very heavy burden of proving that he does."

**LMFAO!!!!!

It's too late for all these gloom-n-doomin idiots........Roberts is in, he is the Chief, and he will be there for decades.

WooooHoooo! Chalk one up for the 'good guys.'**